Research Provider you can trust
TODAY and TOMORROW!
Service Features
  • 275 words per page
  • Font: 12 point Courier New
  • Double line spacing
  • Free unlimited paper revisions
  • Free bibliography
  • Any citation style
  • No delivery charges
  • SMS alert on paper done
  • No plagiarism
  • Direct paper download
  • Original and creative work
  • Researched any subject
  • 24/7 customer support

Robert Bork's "The Right of Privacy". An examination of the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut.

Title: Robert Bork's "The Right of Privacy". An examination of the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut.
Category: /Law & Government/Law Issues
Details: Words: 872 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Robert Bork's "The Right of Privacy". An examination of the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut.
Robert Bork's The Right of Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut. Bork's 'originalist' view proclaimed that Justice Douglas erroneously interpreted the right of privacy from the Constitution. The originalist view is that judges must strictly adhere to the language of the Constitution, thus people do not have a general right to privacy because it was never actually written into the Constitution. This view severely restricts judges in dealing with new issues that our …showed first 75 words of 872 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 872 total…consisting of the most learned and able legal experts in the country) should have the ability to interpret certain aspects of the Constitution in order to prevent the Constitution from becoming a dated, historical document. Problems will continue to rise that the fathers of this country could not have possibly envisioned. Robert Bork's 'originalist' view is far too restrictive in practice to allow the Constitution to be as vital today as it was 200 years ago.

Need a custom written paper?